"{-- Rot13 - Hateme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 30 Aug
2001:
> DeMoN LaG <n@a> wrote in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>> Actually numerous tests have proven that Mozilla/Netscape 6.1 is
>> faster than IE6 on Windows 2000. Go look them up on Cnet
>>
>
> The fact that IE6 is slow on Windows 2000 does not mean that
> mozilla can be legally slow on windows 98. Compare an apple
> to a bad apple is not better than compare it to an orange.
>
> If IE6 can be fast on Windows 98, then mozilla should be
> able to be fast on windows 98 too.
>
The fact that Mozilla is slow on Win 9x doesn't mean IE can be slow on
Windows 2000. What exactly was your point? If Mozilla should be able
to be just as fast on Win 98 than IE should be just as fast on Windows
2000. But it isn't. Live with it
--
ICQ: 123728792
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ = m
