DeMoN LaG <n@a> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Actually numerous tests have proven that Mozilla/Netscape 6.1 is faster > than IE6 on Windows 2000. Go look them up on Cnet > The fact that IE6 is slow on Windows 2000 does not mean that mozilla can be legally slow on windows 98. Compare an apple to a bad apple is not better than compare it to an orange. If IE6 can be fast on Windows 98, then mozilla should be able to be fast on windows 98 too.
- P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) JTK
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) Topics Man
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) DeMoN LaG
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) Thomas
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) DeMoN LaG
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) Ben Ruppel
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) {-- Rot13 - Hateme
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) DeMoN LaG
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) David Bate
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) Jay Garcia
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) JTK
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) Jay Garcia
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) Christian Mattar
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) Marc Attinasi
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) JTK
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) Topics Man
- Re: P.S. (was: Re: IE6.0 Released) Ben Ruppel
