Arthur Barrett wrote: > > I dont know if mention of this belongs here, but the Bi-Di code seems to > have a significant bug with diacritic characters and Unicode fonts > (tested on WinNT). > > Lucida Sans Unicode works fine, but Tahoma and others do not. > > Please see bug 60546 > > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60546 I don't know why this would happen. Does it have something to do with OpenType tables? Lina? Simon? Erik
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Simon Montagu
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Chris Waterson
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Simon Montagu
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Simon Montagu
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Erik van der Poel
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Lina Kemmel
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Simon Montagu
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Erik van der Poel
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 smontagu
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Arthur Barrett
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Erik van der Poel
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Simon Montagu
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Erik van der Poel
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Erik van der Poel
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Lina Kemmel
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Erik van der Poel
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Simon Montagu
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Erik van der Poel
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Lina Kemmel
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Arthur Barrett
- Re: Review of Bi-Di code, bug 62777 Arthur Barrett
