Adam Lock wrote:
> For me the new way means twice as many mouse movements and clicks.
How often do you do that?
> It just seems so pointless
> and inefficient to do the extra clicks when 4.x needed less.
It's not pointless, because 4.x' *functionality* is limited because of that.
> BTW JWZ's site seems like an exercise in obfuscation
Oh, you're right. I just tried - and had to use Google. (Which worked
instantly - lol.) <http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html>
> so I wouldn't
> necessarily follow any advice found there :)
You know that jwz wrote the largest part of the first version of Mailnews?
