Adam Lock wrote:
> Ben Bucksch wrote:
>
>> Adam Lock wrote:
>>
>>> It just seems so pointless
>>> and inefficient to do the extra clicks when 4.x needed less.
>>
>> It's not pointless, because 4.x' *functionality* is limited because of that.
>
> It is limited but only if you want to sort threads other than by date. I
> don't which is why it is extremely convenient rather than limited.
Other people do (like myself on occasion). I always found Netscape's
inability to thread with other sort methods irritating. Finding specific
threads by name, especially, was a chore. I consider Mozilla's behavior
a big improvement.
