I don't know if your PhD automatically qualifies you as a good experimental scientists. Last I heard was that 95% of studies published in scientific peer reviewed journals were bad to uninterpretable. You probably meant to say that bias is a large and vast concept and "bias of ascertainment" is a specific type of bias. Instead of using the $0.50 phrase "bias of ascertainment", how about a $0.05 rendition of what you think it means so any dumb hick like me knows what your talking about. But if it's what I suspect then it's a simple enough issue to deal with and has been dealt with in many ways for decades. Surveys and marketing research aren't recent inventions. They can get the goods on what populations will generalize to the target audience for the browsers release.
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Vineet Sinha
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Gervase Markham
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Gervase Markham
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
