Amir Herzberg wrote:
> It is not an issue of fairness, it is an issue of open process. I am
> indeed disappointed to find that Mozilla is not acting openly. As a
> believer in open process, I am concerned that the result may be
> suboptimal.
I would like the process to be more open. I hope and expect that in the
future, it will be. However, to achieve the goal, it can't be open right
now.
> This is not the way to encourage innovation. In fact, this
> situation, which was not even disclosed openly during this lengthy
> discussion,
As I said, some of those involved are reticent about their involvement.
And I hope the occupants of this newsgroup won't go shooting their
mouths off in blogs and on Slashdot.
> puts Heikki's advice on `develop code` in rather strange
> light.
Not at all. Just because we're not in a position to accept your code now
doesn't mean it's not valuable.
> I'm not planning to stop coding (yet), but I think you should
> have indicated that at least the Mozilla group thinks that working in a
> closed committee will be more effective
Please don't make it so black and white - it's not. I personally don't
think a closed group is any more effective, but I'm not the only person
with a view on the question.
Gerv
_______________________________________________
Mozilla-security mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-security
