> where can you
> draw the line?
That's exactly my point, but from a different angle: We shouldn't let
Hollywood or RIAA (a.k.a. "capitalist pigs") decide, where to draw the
line. They want laws that justify _their_ acts.
> it's about immaterial copyright concept, with music it's
> more or less impossible to say when exactly copying becomes stealing,
> never mind the software or hardware. isn't it?
Well, you've (we've) made illegal copies of music and films for a
decade or two. Nothing new in it. Remember, the recording industry
tried to stop c-cassette copying too... It's not about stealing at
all, it just about greed. Recording industry wants us to pay in every
turn it's possible to get some money.
> napster with friends just
> made it really clear for the first time that the physical
> disc/tape/whatever isn't the issue. (maybe that's what they are suing
> them for!)
The real reason is for the Napster buzz is, that the middlemen in the
whole recording industry are starting to lose the justification for
their existence. At the same time, record sales have continued to
rise...
---> jab / commie
Commie net radio: http://commie.oy.com/radio.html
Now playing: Komeda - Fire
