On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Mark Taylor wrote: > Anyone know what the Windows codec API is? I thought they were distributed > as .dll's? I wasn't thinking when I suggested that. Really, it would be nice if you could also use lame as a tool to increase awareness of free software in the windows world.. If lame is LGPLed then companies might consign it to the depts of /windows/system never to be seen by the user. :( Is there a way w/ the stock LGPL to make sure that user knows they are using LAME which is free? Sorta like an electronic version of the BSD advert clause? -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 detection Mike Oliphant
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] MP3 detection mikecheng
- [MP3 ENCODER] LAME in commercial produtcs Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME in commercial produtcs Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME in commercial produ... Mikhail M. Fedotov
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME in commercial p... Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME in commercial produ... Mark Taylor
- [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Greg Maxwell
- [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36be... Monty
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36be... Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.... Frank Baumgart
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.... Kimmo Mustonen
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.... Kimmo Mustonen
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.... Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.... Gerhard Wesp
