On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Mark Taylor wrote: > Also changes to mpglib should only be done when absolutly necessary, > since they will just be lost when the mpg123 people come out with > a new mpglib and we upgrade. I think I'll contact them and ask them to do those changes then. Kimmo -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME in commercial produtcs Mikhail M. Fedotov
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME in commercial produtcs Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME in commercial produtcs Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME in commercial produtcs Greg Maxwell
- [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Monty
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Frank Baumgart
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Kimmo Mustonen
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Kimmo Mustonen
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Gerhard Wesp
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Gerhard Wesp
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Sergey Dubov
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME in commercial produtcs Albert Faber
