Roel> I just tried on the version without extensions.  I don't understand
Roel> the extra benefit of the nspsytune.  Please explain to me what flaw needed
Roel> fixing in the older lame's and how you did it?  I still find the sound
Roel> not good, and the file only gets needlessly bigger.

  Perhaps you are hoping joint stereo to be improved, but --nspsytune
doesn't improve anything with joint stereo.
  --nspsytune is intended to improve result of vbrtest.wav and square
wave with VBR. You can obtain vbrtest.wav from website of lame. And,
--nspsytune improves CBR quality at bitrate like 128kbps. Perhaps you
can easily notice difference with result of appluad.wav.


Roel> Maybe my standards are too high, but there is (and has been always) a
Roel> serious JS problem on the velvet track (http://r3mix.50g.com):

  I'm also aware that there is some problem with joint stereo of lame.


--
Naoki Shibata   e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to