On Wednesday, 10 October 2001 at 15:14, Brent Geery wrote: > On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:25:55 +0200, David Balazic > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Brent Geery wrote: > >> > >> For some unknown reason, there seems to be hostile resistance to > >> adding a simple balance adjusting feature to LAME. I'm not sure I > >> understand the hostility. It wouldn't add an load to the programmers > >> load, as the functions are already there in the --scale function. > >> > >> Some are arguing against the feature, simply because they don't think > >> *they* wouldn't use it. This is both childish, and insensitive. What > >> do you care if someone else finds a use for the simple-to-add feature? > > > >Code bloat. LAME is a mp3 encoder, not a sound editor or effect generator. > > Enough of this fanboy nonsense! Plonk.
Please don't be an ass, at least on the public list. Some people assume that they only have to kiss the ass of actual developers when pleading for a feature. In my experience public rudeness even to non-developers will prejudice real programmers against your little feature. Thank you. _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
