Thanks to Dean Carlson on prompt and precise numbers. It is my understanding that the most rigid enforcer of rental screening is MPHA. Their standards are highest and most rigidly enforced. Does Dean or anyone have a short/long list of what MPHA considers deal breakers for potential applicants? Crim, collections, UD's, etc.
And a follow up. If MPHA does have the highest standards, Why? Is that what public funded projects are for? Craig A. Miller Former Fultonite [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Since October, MPHA has been 99.5 percent occupied, and was 99 percent > occupied for 65 straight months before that. The vacancies are due to unit > turnover. This includes 4,724 highrise units all of which are either > occupied are under turnover (typical turnover time: 15 days). In addition > there are approximately 1,000 scattered site and townhome units. Currently > 7 scattered units are under rehab for lead abatement. There are a couple of > scattered site units under turnover. MPHA owns no other vacant or unused > residential property. > > Hope this helps. > > Dean E. Carlson > East Harriet, Ward 10 > > _______________________________________ > Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy > Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: > http://e-democracy.org/mpls _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
