"W. Brandon Lacy Campos" wrote: > For example, in Spanish, which I also speak, the adjective comes after the noun. > That is a fundamental difference in terms of how one thinks about the > world...the car red not the red car. All of these thing have an impact on > the way a child learns. The more teachers understand about various learning > styles and teaching styles the more children they will be able to > successfully reach.
Where do you come up with this stuff? The Whorfian hypothesis has been discredited for some time now. Cognitively it makes no difference where you put the adjective. A red car, is a car red, is a red car; there is no there there. >I think that Thomas Swift absolutely missed the boat with his comments. I think he's on the boat, he's just a little off course. Emphasizing differences, the salad bowl approach is foolish, I much prefer the melting pot. Immigration is one of the factors that has and continues to make this a Great country, Think what it would be like if all the ghettos since the 1600s still remained. One of the problems with multi-culturalism is that it tries to rewrite history as much as the old White guys did. In the 70s I took sometime to learn a little about my native american heritage and it ain't "Dances with Wolves." If you want to see a realistic Indian movie rent "Black Robe." This is not to say the old White guys were sweethearts, Andrew Jackson was an evil SOB. >Forcing a child, who may not be a citizen of this country, to recite the >pledge of allegiance is wrong. FORCING a child who is a citizen of this country to recite the pledge of allegiance is wrong. It's a violation of everything this country stands for. >While I think sex education should be taught once children understand sex, Which comes first the understanding of sex or the teaching? >I think sexuality education, ie acknowledging that there are >gays and lesbians in the world, should be taught as a rote part of any >lesson. Well I support rote learning. However, I'm not sure that it's necessary for children to memorize that people of the same gender have sex with each other...I think that it's easy enough for them to understand without memorization. >Just as we talk about black, Jewish, whatever authors, we should be >able to tell our children that such and such a person was gay or lesbian. >Doing anything else again sets up the standard of the other. It is particularly important to know that Walt Whitman was gay? Well, maybe, but I think that it is more important that students understand that the Athenians were perfectly able to mix sexual preference and civilization, and the Spartans were perfectly able to mix sexual preference and militarism. And we know that Muslims don't allow much mixing of any kind. >Acknowledging and accepting that we are all different, that there is >strength in that difference, will enable us to come together with our >difference instead of inspite of our differences. There is little strength in differences, differences breed conflict. It is commonalties and a basic respect for the rights of others that help to unify our "united" states. Michael Atherton Prospect Park _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
