> >> Next question: why $46,000? Seems like the incentive for not leaving >> early >> could have been thousands less than what is, after all, a year's >> salary for most Minneapolitans. > > > I don't think we can look at this compared to the wages "for most > Minneapolitans," David Jennings has a skill set that both demands and > deserves a higher salary than the metro median income. > > He also faces the reality that he likely won't find a new job in a > matter of a few weeks.
Just want to be sure there's no misunderstanding...I don't begrudge Jennings (or any superintendent or high-ranking district leader) MAKING more than a Minneapolitan's average yearly income. I do think it's worth questioning them getting that size of lump-sum payment when they leave and are NOT WORKING for us anymore... David Brauer Kingfield REMINDERS: 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait. For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
