Bravo!

This really is what saying "no" is all about - forcing the sports franchises
to pay 
their own costs of doing business.  Why have we had $100+ million contracts
in 
professional sports?  Because the market will bear it.  Why will the market
bear it?  
Because the sports teams really have that much money to burn.  Why do they have

that much money to burn, which could be used instead paying for their own 
stadiums?  Because the public has let them force it to pay those bills through

government subsidies and building projects.  Enough is enough.  Whether the

economy is good or bad, there is absolutely no excuse for cities and states
to pay 
these costs to enrich sports owners.

Something that we need also to remember is that once upon a time, stadiums cost

a heck of a lot less, relatively, than they do now.  There weren't the kind
of lavish 
demands made by teams - giant electronic scoreboards, retractible roofs, special

boxes only the rich and famous will see from the inside.  The fact that the
Vikings 
and the Twins started crying for a new stadium when the old one - built to THEIR

requests, including that "awful" non-retractible dome - hadn't been fully paid
for 
should be a point of outrage to every taxpayer in Minnesota.  But governments
and 
taxpayers haven't been cueing in to the fact that the wish lists grow ever more

elaborate and expensive, and requests have become strident demands for new 

toys as a matter of "right" and "civic responsibility."  How DARE the public
refuse 
them???

The fight needs to be spelled out - it's not just about saying no to building
a 
stadium in this or that city, it's about all cities saying no and ending for
all time the 
expectation that a city would ever say yes.  Whether it's $10 million or $100

million, it is criminal for a government to give that money out as corporate
welfare 
for these few fat-cats when it could be used to 

- save a few teachers' jobs
- pay a few teachers something closer to a living wage
- provide housing for the homeless
- provide  medical care for the needy
- improve public transit
- clean up a polluted area

and much more.

Sure, we may lose the Twins or the Vikings if another city foolishly caves in
and 
adopts them.  Let them go.  We lost the North Stars once.  It didn't kill us.
 We 
didn't have a basketball team once.  We weren't shamed before all the world
as a 
community that didn't have a basketball team.  Those who cared about the sports

watched other states' teams in their living rooms and in bars, and had a glorious

time.  (Most still do, rather than pay the tickets, parking, and other costs
to come 
to the stadium, anyway.)  We didn't go from podunk to world class city or vice

versa because we gained or lost one of these entertainment-industry parasites.


Roxana Orrell
Central


>Terrell wrote:
>Unfortunately, if we don't put some money into stadium(s), someone else
>likely will and baseball and/or football will leave.  What is the loss?
> How much is it worth to us to avoid that loss?
>
>Ron writes:
>Is this why the Twins moved last year when Carl threatened us?  Or why the
team 
was not eliminated from the league.  I believe there is a city in South Carolina
that 
said no to building a stadium at taxpayer expense.  Me thinks the days of taxpayer

funded stadiums is nearing and end.  I would love to se MN lead the way on this

front.
>
>And as for the Vikings, Red would love nothing more than to move them to LA,

but LA has no interest in funding a stadium for him.  They did get to vote on
it.  I 
do not trust my elected officials to not fall prey to big bucks and say no to
a 
stadium.
>Ron Leurquin
>Nokomis East
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to