Re-hello. Huh, in previous mail, at end please read this:
The last war would be "What is better: libdl.so.2 or ld-linux.so.2 ? Could it be possible to imagine a different dynlibs.pas ? Actual dynlibs.pas is using libdl.so.2. Could it be possible to use ld-linux.so.2 instead (with correspondent methods, of course) ? And for static linking that already uses ld-linux.so.2, if if the "external" bug is fixed, a custom name/path of the library may be used and so have the advantage of a "dynlibs" way. Fre;D -- Sent from: http://mseide-msegui-talk.13964.n8.nabble.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
