Re-hello.

Huh, in previous mail, at end please read this:

The last war would be "What is better: libdl.so.2 or ld-linux.so.2 ? 

Could it be possible to imagine a different dynlibs.pas ? 
Actual dynlibs.pas is using libdl.so.2. 
Could it be possible to use ld-linux.so.2 instead (with correspondent 
methods, of course) ? 

And for static linking that already uses ld-linux.so.2, 
if  if the "external" bug is fixed, a custom name/path of the library 
may be used and so have the advantage of a "dynlibs" way.


Fre;D




--
Sent from: http://mseide-msegui-talk.13964.n8.nabble.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
mseide-msegui-talk mailing list
mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk

Reply via email to