> > Now: IMAGINE what happens when a tracker suddenly DOES support all this
> > features!! I give you a promise here that there is NO-ONE on earth with a
> > cubase-based system who is faster than for example me with a good
>tracker..
> > and if you think this goes to far :) -> challange me !
>
>Hm, do I hear the Ixalance commercial tune in the background here? ;-)
hmm.. I don't :) this has nothing to do with ixalance.. :)
I just defend the tracker concept :)
lets put it in another way: the first time I let something hear (the end of
a project @ school, 1st year, 1st project) ppl were surprised and asked me
how I did it.. and if I said: "with a tracker" ppl didn't believe it at all
:) and asked me why I didn't use midi/cubase.. and then I said: "you gave
the answer yourself by asking me why it sounds like this!"
grtz
the point is: a good composer can make nice stuff with anything.. but a
tracker comes closest to classical notation, the stuff mozart used :)
grtz
Maarten van Strien,
* composer
* sounddesigner
* Ixalance-sound developer
-----------------------------------------------------
http://www.shortcut.nl/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------
Shortcut Software Development B.V.
Julianaweg 9, 3603 AP Maarssen, The Netherlands.
Phone: ++31 (0) 346 579 659
Fax: ++31 (0) 346 579 745
-----------------------------------------------------
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****
