On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Marco Frissen wrote:
> And I am not _not_ supporting MSX.. I am just being realistic.. I would buy
> a new MSX, for the fun of it, but I don't see MSX becoming a success in the
> future, that's all I said.. and there's a lot of difference between
> commercial success and success for geeks..
Well, a new MSX wouldn't have to try competing with the PC, as they're
different markets. It won't need to beat Windows. It will be sucessful as
long as a companies make money with it, even if they don't make so much
money as with the PC. Or at least, that's what I think.
> If a new MSX is made, it should be certain that there will be software for
> it, which uses all of its features... a new MSX is useless if you are only
> running the old software on it.... that was my point..
I agree with you. If a new MSX is made, it should be released with at
least a new version of MSX-DOS (3?). And of course, software companies
would have to develop for it. We know for certain that Compile is
interested. I bet Konami would be too. But hey, anything I could say know
are just my thoughts, as I don't know what will happen. Let's wait.
Regards,
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.aamsx.org
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****
