On Mar 11, 2004, at 6:30 PM, Tom Foottit wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Alex Perez wrote:Since when has popularity become the defining factor over objective analysis? If it were all about popularity, we'd all be running Windows XP, and we'd all be using Palm Desktop, and *this project wouldn't exist*.
- it is not ported atm (but it will be at least according to havoc)Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah yeah....
- it is not completly stable yetExactly.
Ignoring all of the advantages that Armin mentioned. I consider
portability to Win32 a secondary consideration, and with the amount of
attention dbus is getting it should stabilize before too long. We aren't
going to be releasing 0.90 next week - take the long view.
--
* Basic text (i.e. not XML)This is actually what I prefer, but everyone seems to want something else these days.
This is probably because parsing text files yourself is really a bad idea...Look at text plists. You can get C plist parsing code from quakeforge CVS.
I consider plists a non-starter, as is defining our own arbitrary text
file format. If we decide that GConf is too heavy then I suspect that an
XML format and libxml2 will be the way we go.
Tom
Alex Perez
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it."
--Thomas Jefferson
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Multisync-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-devel