On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Alex Perez wrote: > > On Mar 11, 2004, at 6:30 PM, Tom Foottit wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Alex Perez wrote: > > > >>> - it is not ported atm (but it will be at least according to havoc) > >> Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah yeah.... > >> > >>> - it is not completly stable yet > >> Exactly. > > > > Ignoring all of the advantages that Armin mentioned. I consider > > portability to Win32 a secondary consideration, and with the amount of > > attention dbus is getting it should stabilize before too long. We > > aren't > > going to be releasing 0.90 next week - take the long view. > Since when has popularity become the defining factor over objective > analysis? If it were all about popularity, we'd all be running Windows > XP, and we'd all be using Palm Desktop, and *this project wouldn't > exist*.
Who said anything about popularity? All you did is make glib remarks about dbus - I don't see any objective analysis there. Your remarks quite frankly are way out of line. *Sigh* Thanks to those to provided some input regarding GConf - unless anyone has something else constructive to add I'll consider this closed. Tom ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Multisync-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/multisync-devel
