yes, i realise this. this is not a problem for a database, though, and the interface for such a facility would have to be completely redone anyway so you could easily allow this.
2008/5/9 Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I don't - we'll end up then having to allow the same discID several times on > the same release as well. It's quite possible and far from rare for the > same CD master, generating the same toc, to be reused in different > countries, for rereleases, etc. > > Brian > > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Bram van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> I like this idea! >> >> Chris B schreef: >> > 2008/5/9 Lukáš Lalinský <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > >> >> If they were hidden, it would be ok to keep them? I think we all know >> >> that the MB website is far from ideal, but we should change the graphic >> >> layout to fit the data, not the data to fit the layout. >> >> >> > >> > one idea might be to (at some point down the line) allow assigning of >> > disc IDs to specific release events. eg, if you had a copy of the 2003 >> > reissue of Foo, you could assign that disc id to the relevant event, >> > and all other unassigned disc ids could sit in some kind of collapsed, >> > hidden section. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Musicbrainz-style mailing list >> > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >> > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Musicbrainz-style mailing list >> Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style