I don't - we'll end up then having to allow the same discID several times on the same release as well. It's quite possible and far from rare for the same CD master, generating the same toc, to be reused in different countries, for rereleases, etc.
Brian On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Bram van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like this idea! > > Chris B schreef: > > 2008/5/9 Lukáš Lalinský <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> If they were hidden, it would be ok to keep them? I think we all know > >> that the MB website is far from ideal, but we should change the graphic > >> layout to fit the data, not the data to fit the layout. > >> > > > > one idea might be to (at some point down the line) allow assigning of > > disc IDs to specific release events. eg, if you had a copy of the 2003 > > reissue of Foo, you could assign that disc id to the relevant event, > > and all other unassigned disc ids could sit in some kind of collapsed, > > hidden section. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Musicbrainz-style mailing list > Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style >
_______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
