that is how I started I think

i added a task (also called testparent) on android in my inbox.  i then
added a note to it.  and sync'd.  then on my pc i changed the note and
added children and re-occurance and then synced and everything was fine.
 then i started completing sub tasks and making changes and letting them
reoccur and so on and so forth and i think (but i may be wrong) that i
tried every combination but it didn't break

do you have that specific order that caused yours to break? or point me to
the thread that has the order? now i have doubts that my data is intact on
all that was pre-existing

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Lisa Stroyan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Andrey has verified at least one of the defects(posted to another forum,
> the beta forum I think) as an unfortunate result of the architecture. The
> other I was able to get by adding a note to a parent on Android, then
> making that recur on PC by completing subtasks, then syncing in a
> particular order -- unless he special cased notes in the sync in recent
> versions, which would be VERY VERY COOL (Andrey?)  I don't mind losing the
> occasional instantiation of a task, especially if it just means I need to
> complete it again, but notes are real data and would be worth a special
> case or their own time stamp, or appending the two on Android in case of
> conflict.
>
> Lisa
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:36 AM, daniel sekera <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> fwiw and I really don't want to add any confusion to this thread but I
>> cannot make mine break
>>
>> I have been playing with this since yesterday trying to replicate what is
>> happening and I cannot.  All parts of this, parent, child, notes,
>> re-occurence, times, everything sync flawlessly and without conflicts of
>> any type and all notes are intact.  no matter which direction I start the
>> sync or which direction I make changes.
>>
>> very strange. wish I could help
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Lisa Stroyan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Do you get a lot of sync conflicts you have to resolve?
>>>
>>> Lisa
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> For what it’s worth, the discussion below mentioned so many times that
>>>> there should be fewer problems if Android synched first, so I decided to
>>>> try to force it. I have adopted the following routine: whenever I sit down
>>>> at my computer after a while away from it, before touching the computer I
>>>> take out my phone and synch MLO to cloud. Then I go on about my business.
>>>> It’s annoying and time consuming but problems with my daily routine are way
>>>> down. I still experienced one incident where I had started a new cycle of
>>>> the monthly routine and clicked off a few tasks and the next morning I
>>>> found computer and phone both back to a fresh cycle with nothing checked
>>>> off. I may have missed once at synching the phone before touching the
>>>> computer. But generally, this seems to be a workaround.****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Lisa Stroyan
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 01, 2012 10:46 AM
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [MLO] android/windows sync issues****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> Hi Dwight. I was gone all weekend but finally got a (brief) chance to
>>>> read through your reply. ****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> In short, I really don't know how modification times effect things,
>>>> other than I'm pretty sure both platforms use them for conflict resolution.
>>>> I do believe that any time a task is marked as modified it will get synced,
>>>> irrelevant of how old the time is. ****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> But I've not seen a case where a parent is marked as modified based on
>>>> a child attribute change, unless the automatic sync is triggered -- but
>>>> that doesn't mean it won't happen. ****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> You know, I've been thinking about how several of us have suggested a
>>>> new feature for the desktop where different actions can be triggered based
>>>> on different criteria.  I'm now thinking the sync architecture would have
>>>> to be improved before this feature could be implemented, since it would
>>>> really bring existing problems to the fore.****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> Lisa****
>>>>
>>>> ** **
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:13 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:****
>>>>
>>>> If a single subtask is changed, I don't get the parent marked as
>>>> modified. But if I change the note of "Testparent" on Android, then
>>>> complete and auto-recur Testparent on the PC, sync PC, and sync Android,
>>>> the changed note will be lost on Android. Is that what you mean?  But you
>>>> see it sometimes *without* the recurrence happening?****
>>>>
>>>> *I have not been paying attention to date/time of modification. Are
>>>> you certain that a task is subject to synch if AND ONLY IF date/time of
>>>> modification is sufficiently recent? Without thinking too much about it I
>>>> had assumed that date/time of modification was a sufficient but not
>>>> necessary condition, and that other factors could also trigger a task to be
>>>> candidate for sync.*****
>>>>
>>>> * *****
>>>>
>>>> *I have not been able to reproduce this and am not 100% certain that
>>>> it happens as I describe it, but I have a sense that completing a subtask
>>>> of a recurring task that recurs based on subtask completion, would cause
>>>> the parent to sync even if its modification date was unchanged.*****
>>>>
>>>> * *****
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lisa****
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Lisa Stroyan, mailto: [email protected] <[email protected]> ****
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.****
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lisa
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Lisa Stroyan, mailto: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "MyLifeOrganized" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lisa
>
> ------------------------------
> Lisa Stroyan, mailto: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MyLifeOrganized" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.

Reply via email to