I think that what we're all forgetting is that the manpower just isn't there. I've pretty much gathered from what hasn't and has been said that Andrey just doesn't have the manpower to do all of this. It's apparent to me that he's not even trying to be competitive at this point probably because he can't. I'm willing to guess that MLO hasn't been Andrey's "bread and butter" so development is probably being done on the side. As much as I love MLO, let's face it, development is slow. I'm seeing features in open source software out there that is free, for example, that MLO has yet to include (i.e., rich text notes, calendar support) so as a user, I'm fortunate enough to be using a platform on which MLO works.
All of these ideas sound great but when would any of it really be implemented? At this rate, not soon enough to be practical, it seems. I'm not trying to be negative but that's the state of things as they are now. If I'm wrong on that then by all means, let me know because I want to be. Joel On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:09:33 PM UTC-5, Jake01 wrote: > > > - If we are talking about ultimate commercial success, it would be > sufficient to follow the road map of a top developer, like for example, > Evernote > - Evernote has fully functional native applications on the two major > desktop OSs > - Has somewhat less functional (but more UI optimized) native > support on the various mobile OSs > - Has a sufficiently functional web interface > > > - Based on the above, MLO is not far behind, relatively speaking! > - MLO's strength is in the nuanced interface for a major desktop OS > - Even if/when a web version is available, we should not look to it > for a full set of features, because the web technologies of today are > too > clumsy to replicate the winning UI features which we all love in MLO > > > - Further OS expansion, that is, to ensure "a future", would be based > on total market share/utilization vs development effort > - I doubt that the various Linux implementations are on this map, nor > should they be > - MLO is not open source, just because you choose an open source OS > does not mean that all your favorite apps will suddenly be supported > - When you can run Microsoft Project on Raspberry Pi, then this > line of concerns will be more relevant. Perhaps this should have been > my > first point instead of last > > > On Tuesday, November 6, 2012 3:44:29 AM UTC-6, Darius wrote: >> >> I've checked a MLO roadmap and I must say I don't see a good future for >> MLO . MLO is doing a big mistake: no web app or API for MLO cloud, there is >> even no basic support for web planned . Now MLO is just not a true multi OS >> device. >> >> I've have 3 new machines and on every of them I cannot use MLO. One is >> Raspberry PI, one is laptop with Ubuntu, one is VMware with Lubuntu for my >> TV ( I have Windows PC and Galaxy note which I am using fine with MLO) . I >> know, this is Linux and Linux is not supported, but the problem is bigger: >> >> Now we have Windows RT released. How to use MLO? >> As in my example I have some machines with Linux, how to use MLO? >> If windows 8 fails, and some people will turn to Mac/Linux, what to do? >> If I bought chrome book, how to use MLO? >> >> In short I don't think the developement for all the OS will be fast >> enough without any web app... >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/C5Xzsl3Xf3UJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
