This is a list for Network Operators, AWS certainly operates networks. Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 4:27 PM, K. Scott Helms <[email protected]> wrote: > > > No, > > It really does not. Section 230 only applies to publishers, and not to > network providers. If this were a cloud hosting provider list then you'd be > correct, but as a network provider's list it does not belong here. > > > Scott Helms > > > >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 3:21 PM Lady Benjamin PD Cannon <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> As network operations and compute/cloud/hosting operations continue to >> coalesce, I very much disagree with you. Section 230 is absolutely >> relevant, this discussion is timely and relevant, and it directly affects me >> as both a telecom and cloud compute/services provider. >> >> >> —L.B. >> >> Lady Benjamin PD Cannon, ASCE >> 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC >> CEO >> [email protected] >> "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in >> the world.” >> FCC License KJ6FJJ >> >> <Speedtest9118.png> >> <Ben LIC.png> >> >>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 12:13 PM, K. Scott Helms <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> It's not, and frankly it's disappointing to see people pushing an agenda >>> here. >>> >>> >>> Scott Helms >>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 9:37 AM <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> NANOG is a group of Operators, discussion does not have to be about >>>> networking. I have already explained how this represents a significant >>>> issue for Network Operators. >>>> >>>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:09 AM, Mike Bolitho <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> It has nothing to do with networking. Their decision was necessarily >>>> political. If you can specifically bring up an issue, beyond speculative, >>>> on how their new chosen CDN is somehow now causing congestion or routing >>>> issues on the public internet, then great. But as of now, that isn't even >>>> a thing. It's just best to leave it alone because it will devolve into >>>> chaos. >>>> >>>> - Mike Bolitho >>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 6:54 AM <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Why? This is extremely relevant to network operators and is not political >>>>> at all. >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 8:51 AM, Mike Bolitho <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can we please not go down this rabbit hole on here? List admins? >>>>> >>>>> - Mike Bolitho >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 1:26 AM William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Anybody looking for a new customer opportunity? It seems Parler is in >>>>>> search of a new service provider. Vendors need only provide all the >>>>>> proprietary AWS APIs that Parler depends upon to function. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/09/amazon-parler-suspension/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Bill HErrin >>
