No, this is a list for Network Operators. Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 5:32 PM, K. Scott Helms <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This is a list for pushing bits. The fact that many/most of us have other > businesses doesn't make this an appropriate forum for SIP issues (to use my > own work as an example). > >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 4:52 PM <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is a list for Network Operators, AWS certainly operates networks. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 4:27 PM, K. Scott Helms <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> No, >>> >>> It really does not. Section 230 only applies to publishers, and not to >>> network providers. If this were a cloud hosting provider list then you'd >>> be correct, but as a network provider's list it does not belong here. >>> >>> >>> Scott Helms >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 3:21 PM Lady Benjamin PD Cannon <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> As network operations and compute/cloud/hosting operations continue to >>>> coalesce, I very much disagree with you. Section 230 is absolutely >>>> relevant, this discussion is timely and relevant, and it directly affects >>>> me as both a telecom and cloud compute/services provider. >>>> >>>> >>>> —L.B. >>>> >>>> Lady Benjamin PD Cannon, ASCE >>>> 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC >>>> CEO >>>> [email protected] >>>> "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in >>>> the world.” >>>> FCC License KJ6FJJ >>>> >>>> <Speedtest9118.png> >>>> <Ben LIC.png> >>>> >>>>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 12:13 PM, K. Scott Helms <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It's not, and frankly it's disappointing to see people pushing an agenda >>>>> here. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Scott Helms >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 9:37 AM <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> NANOG is a group of Operators, discussion does not have to be about >>>>>> networking. I have already explained how this represents a significant >>>>>> issue for Network Operators. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:09 AM, Mike Bolitho <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It has nothing to do with networking. Their decision was necessarily >>>>>> political. If you can specifically bring up an issue, beyond >>>>>> speculative, on how their new chosen CDN is somehow now causing >>>>>> congestion or routing issues on the public internet, then great. But as >>>>>> of now, that isn't even a thing. It's just best to leave it alone >>>>>> because it will devolve into chaos. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Mike Bolitho >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 6:54 AM <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why? This is extremely relevant to network operators and is not >>>>>>> political at all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 8:51 AM, Mike Bolitho <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can we please not go down this rabbit hole on here? List admins? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Mike Bolitho >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 1:26 AM William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anybody looking for a new customer opportunity? It seems Parler is in >>>>>>>> search of a new service provider. Vendors need only provide all the >>>>>>>> proprietary AWS APIs that Parler depends upon to function. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/09/amazon-parler-suspension/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Bill HErrin >>>>
