Right, it's not a list for content hosting. Scott Helms
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 5:42 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > No, this is a list for Network Operators. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 10, 2021, at 5:32 PM, K. Scott Helms <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > This is a list for pushing bits. The fact that many/most of us have other > businesses doesn't make this an appropriate forum for SIP issues (to use my > own work as an example). > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 4:52 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This is a list for Network Operators, AWS certainly operates networks. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jan 10, 2021, at 4:27 PM, K. Scott Helms <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> No, >> >> It really does not. Section 230 only applies to publishers, and not to >> network providers. If this were a cloud hosting provider list then you'd >> be correct, but as a network provider's list it does not belong here. >> >> >> Scott Helms >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 3:21 PM Lady Benjamin PD Cannon <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> As network operations and compute/cloud/hosting operations continue to >>> coalesce, I very much disagree with you. Section 230 is absolutely >>> relevant, this discussion is timely and relevant, and it directly affects >>> me as both a telecom and cloud compute/services provider. >>> >>> >>> —L.B. >>> >>> Lady Benjamin PD Cannon, ASCE >>> 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC >>> CEO >>> [email protected] >>> "The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company >>> in the world.” >>> FCC License KJ6FJJ >>> >>> <Speedtest9118.png> >>> <Ben LIC.png> >>> >>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 12:13 PM, K. Scott Helms <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> It's not, and frankly it's disappointing to see people pushing an agenda >>> here. >>> >>> >>> Scott Helms >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 9:37 AM <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> NANOG is a group of Operators, discussion does not have to be about >>> networking. I have already explained how this represents a significant >>> issue for Network Operators. >>> >>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:09 AM, Mike Bolitho <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> It has nothing to do with networking. Their decision was necessarily >>> political. If you can specifically bring up an issue, beyond speculative, >>> on how their new chosen CDN is somehow now causing congestion or routing >>> issues on the public internet, then great. But as of now, that isn't even a >>> thing. It's just best to leave it alone because it will devolve into chaos. >>> >>> - Mike Bolitho >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 6:54 AM <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Why? This is extremely relevant to network operators and is not >>> political at all. >>> >>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 8:51 AM, Mike Bolitho <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Can we please not go down this rabbit hole on here? List admins? >>> >>> - Mike Bolitho >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021, 1:26 AM William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Anybody looking for a new customer opportunity? It seems Parler is in >>> search of a new service provider. Vendors need only provide all the >>> proprietary AWS APIs that Parler depends upon to function. >>> >>> >>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/09/amazon-parler-suspension/ >>> >>> Regards, >>> Bill HErrin >>> >>> >>>
