Hi Kent,
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Kent Beck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason,
>
> My concerns with the integration process are efficiency and
learning. When I
> am notified of a build breakage after the fact, I have to interrupt my
> current task, take a while to remember what I was working on, and
then take
> a while to get back to my task. That seems inefficient to me. It's
worth ten
> minutes of waiting to avoid eleven minutes of task switching (YMMV).
When I
> find a problem right away, not only do I fix it faster but I have a
better
> chance of learning not to make that kind of problem in the future.
Waiting seems less efficient to me if my build success rate is high
enough. With the numbers used, if my build success rate is 1 in 2,
it's still better not to wait.
How do you see that waiting provides a better chance of learning?
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
