I would buy that!

On Friday, April 21, 2017 at 11:39:29 PM UTC-4, Jens Boos wrote:
>
> Wow, now we did it. Is that really the message we want to send to a person 
> who is looking into making Nixie tubes?
>
> I admire Dalibor for what he has achieved. Perhaps some of you remember 
> that I tried the same and did not get far, this is my best "Nixie tube" I 
> ever made:
>
>
>
> But all of this aside, I ask you if these comments are really helpful? 
> Calling somebody a "wannabe" in a disrespectful manner? I, for one, like 
> people who "want to" achieve something. Don't you?
>
> Cheers
> Jens
>
>
> On 4/21/2017 7:01 PM, Instrument Resources of America wrote:
>
> There are a LOT of WANNABE's out there that do NOT have the slightest clue 
> as to what is involved in such a venture!!!   Ira. 
>
>
> On 4/21/2017 9:41 AM, chuck richards wrote: 
>
> Dalibor, 
>
> Thanks again for all that you do. 
>
> You obviously have devoted your whole life for the past several 
> years to the manufacturing of high-quality brand new large nixie 
> tubes. 
>
> There will always be some folks on the side-lines who want to 
> talk about and to theorize about "better" and "cheaper" methods 
> of tube production. 
>
> Not bloody likely!! 
>
> What you have accomplished is most remarkable! 
>
> I especially like reading the part where you explain that 
> computers and automation don't help much. 
>
> That is a fact that people who have never tried any production 
> methods will argue with.  But, as you point out, once one actually 
> does their experiments and starts learning how to get it done, one 
> will find that computers and automation just can't cope with the 
> entire situation very well at all. 
>
> Again, congratulations to you and your entire team of dedicated 
> people! 
>
> Chuck 
>
>
>
>
> ---- Original Message ---- 
> From: [email protected] <javascript:> 
> To: [email protected] <javascript:> 
> Subject: RE: [neonixie-l] Re: Manufacturing affordable large, new 
> nixie tubes 
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:16:33 -0700 (PDT) 
>
> Hello! 
>
> I am sending few notes to this topic, from a perspective of someone 
>
> who 
>
> spent last 5 years exclusively in nixie tubes manufacture ;-) 
>
> IMHO, $25 nixie tube is not possible. Nixie tubes were never so 
>
> cheap, even 
>
> in 60s, the less expensive tube from Burroughs was for $8 (equal to 
>
> today's 
>
> $64) when bought in a quantity of 1000pcs, type B-5016, no mercury. 
>
> Large 
>
> tube (B-7094) were for $30 (today's $240). In this time, the nixie 
>
> tubes 
>
> were cutting edge technology with generous budget, hoard of R&D 
>
> engineers 
>
> and whole tube backing industry. They were produced in large 
>
> quantities for 
>
> lot of equipment, mostly measuring devices - almost never for 
>
> digital 
>
> clocks, they were simply expensive for consumer market. 
> You can now find small tubes on eBay for around $5, mostly russian 
>
> tubes - 
>
> their price is now determined by market (what are hobbyists willing 
>
> to pay 
>
> for it), not manufacturing costs. They were produced in large 
>
> volumes in 
>
> soviet central planned economy, even when the demand was decreasing 
>
> - this 
>
> is why there are still full stocks of them in former soviet 
>
> countries. 
>
> You mention "current manufacturing methods", we actually dont have 
>
> much new 
>
> technologies which could simplify the nixie tube manufacture. The 
>
> use of 
>
> computers is very limited and doesnt help much. Also new 
>
> technologies like 
>
> laser cutting etc. doesnt help (only for machinery construction, 
>
> jigs..). 
>
> There are tens of operations involved in the 
>
> assembly/sealing/pumping 
>
> procedures - the quantity of machines needed for automated line 
>
> would be 
>
> big and their price very high. As NeonJohn suggested - few $M would 
>
> be 
>
> necessary just for the machinery. You would also soon find that 
>
> automation 
>
> make demands on supplier's tolerances ( e.g. glass thickness, 
>
> diameter) 
>
> which is beyond their standard production capabilities = back to 
>
> hand 
>
> processing.. This is one of the reason why large factories like 
>
> Blackburn 
>
> had own facilities for production of all the raw materials/prefabs. 
> Last year, I had a meeting with people from german company producing 
> glassworking machines - simple semiautomated machine just for 
>
> sealing 
>
> operation (stem/envelope) which still needs operator starts at 
>
> $250.000 and 
>
> its production capacity is not so high (my estimation was 30 
>
> tubes/hour). 
>
> And this is one of very few pieces of equipment you can purchase, 
>
> the rest 
>
> is necessary to develop - according to your specifications and 
>
> process 
>
> description. 
>
> But even if you had a fully equiped factory now, it would take you 
>
> long 
>
> time to get to working nixie tubes. It is not about machines, but 
>
> about the 
>
> operator/R&D - you need to know when the tube is sufficiently 
>
> degassed 
>
> before filling, what purity of the raw material is necessary, purity 
>
> of the 
>
> gases, time for aging etc.. Many factors, each of them can make your 
>
> tube 
>
> prone to failure. Not immediately, but after year of operation for 
>
> instance 
>
> - your backers will not wait years until you come up with working 
> combination.. 
>
> Some data from our business: 
> - Our price for a tube is now set to $145. 
> - We make around 130 tubes per month (+ handful of clocks) with 
>
> monthly 
>
> revenue of around 20.000 USD. 
> - We are now a team of 5 people and this production volume makes us 
>
> really 
>
> busy (I work 7 days a week, all day long). 
> - We need 250 square meters (2700sqft) of space for our current 
>
> equipment. 
>
> - As for the "butique price" - my monthly net salary is $384, I get 
>
> paid 
>
> since February 2017 ;-) But my people's salary is above average (for 
>
> a 
>
> given profession and our region). 
> - I invested around $80.000 from my personal savings on the 
>
> beginning 
>
> I know that if I want to really succeed and earn money, I need to 
>
> cut down 
>
> the production costs. So I am step by step making our manufacture 
>
> efficient 
>
> with the intention to make our nixie tubes less expensive one day. I 
>
> am 
>
> investing our profit back to tooling/equipment, I am for example 
>
> working on 
>
> a high vacuum rotary manifold for carousel pumping machine with 
>
> higher 
>
> production capacity. I recently reverse-engineered Philips vacuum 
>
> locking 
>
> mechanism (tube clamping) for the same machine. But I am not sure if 
>
> it is 
>
> possible to make nixie tubes for below $60-80 even with high level 
>
> of 
>
> automation. 
>
> I hope it doesnt sound too discouraging ;-) just my $0.02 
>
> best regards, 
>
> Dalibor Farny 
>
>
> On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:52:06 UTC+2, Aiden Koh wrote: 
>
> I'm a product engineer taking on a new project. 
> With current manufacturing methods, I'm able to manufacture 
>
> In-18/Z568M 
>
> inspired nixie tubes, at a fraction of their market costs (sub 25 
>
> USD/pc). 
>
> I don't compromise on quality. hence, it will be built with parts 
>
> mostly 
>
> sourced from the US, and have the quality management system 
>
> ISO-certified. 
>
> However, due to overhead costs, such a price is only available if 
>
> the 
>
> minimum demand for said tubes is reached. Hence I can only 
>
> commence with 
>
> the project when I know that there is enough interest. 
>
> What are your thoughts? Would it interest you if such tubes exist? 
>
> show 
>
> your support, and large, affordable nixie tubes may finally be 
>
> within our 
>
> grasp! 
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>
> Groups "neonixie-l" group. 
>
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>
> send an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. 
>
> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>. 
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/7b6b98ca-36c7-42e5-a93f- 
> 9099a6830ca6%40googlegroups.com. 
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>
>
>
> $4.95/mo. National Dialup, Anti-Spam, Anti-Virus, 5mb personal web space. 
> 5x faster dialup for only $9.95/mo. No contracts, No fees, No Kidding! See 
> http://www.All2Easy.net for more details! 
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/c00c4a12-e2c3-4cd7-aa8b-9c85d81a15df%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to