You forgot the one most important thing for ANY product (or service), and that is a 'LARGE' enough base of buyers to support the endeavor. I'm pleasantly surprised that Dalibor can make it work, on what is most likely the buyers in this 'clock hobby' market place. I very seriously doubt that he has very many commercial/industrial, military, government, or consumer based, customers. And those four that I just listed is where most of the demand and therefore money comes from for any product or service. I do agree with the points you made though. And here is something else to think about. Assume for the moment that someone else is indeed successful at doing what Dalibor does. They also make Nixies, that are just as good as Dalibors in every respect. What has happened now is that TWO entities are now fighting for 'market share' of an infinitesimally small market place. The results would be,,,,,,,,,,,??????? Ira.

On 4/22/2017 10:07 AM, Jeff Walton wrote:

Any entrepreneur has to start with a passion for what they are trying to accomplish. Without this, the only guarantee is failure.

The second hurdle is to develop a reliable, functional product that someone would want to purchase.

If you are lucky enough to get this far, then you can work on manufacturability and achieving a price point that will be supported by demand, and cover the cost of production, overhead and profit.

Each of these steps are difficult and can take years of effort and subsidy but that is how products are born… I give a lot of credit to those that make it to product launch and eventual profitability.

*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Instrument Resources of America
*Sent:* Saturday, April 22, 2017 9:42 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Manufacturing affordable large, new nixie tubes

My statement was made with no disrespect, but you are free to interpret it any way that you see fit. Much is often lost in the printed word rather than the spoken word, which is why I always prefer to have an actual conversation. It was meant to be emphatic. I still stick by it. These wannabe's should watch Dalibors' movie, more than once, perhaps if possible visit with Dalibor and see what it actually takes to do what he has accomplished. And accomplished he has, with a huge amount of success. But as already stated by others he has given YEARS of his life and GOBS of money to do what he has done, and I wish him much continued success as he certainly deserves it. IIRC he did not make a profit until February of this year. As for the wannabes, I'm not at all against anyone trying, so long as they know ahead of time what is realistic, and what is not. If Dalibor had not tried we wound not have his excellent tubes today. Who knows perhaps they will be able to produce a better product than Dalibor, but in my opinion probably not. Time will tell. Ira.

On 4/22/2017 5:18 AM, Dylan Distasio wrote:

    I was thinking the same thing.  If he's not asking for funding and
    is open about the risks, let everyone have a shot.  It should be
    encouraged.

    That aside, I am anxiously awaiting my single tube clock using one
    of Dalibors beautiful tubes.  I had to settle for one tube for
    now.  I just got a Kickstarter update that the tubes have arrived!

    On Apr 21, 2017 11:39 PM, "jb-electronics"
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    wrote:

    Wow, now we did it. Is that really the message we want to send to
    a person who is looking into making Nixie tubes?

    I admire Dalibor for what he has achieved. Perhaps some of you
    remember that I tried the same and did not get far, this is my
    best "Nixie tube" I ever made:



    But all of this aside, I ask you if these comments are really
    helpful? Calling somebody a "wannabe" in a disrespectful manner?
    I, for one, like people who "want to" achieve something. Don't you?

    Cheers
    Jens




    On 4/21/2017 7:01 PM, Instrument Resources of America wrote:

        There are a LOT of WANNABE's out there that do NOT have the
        slightest clue as to what is involved in such a venture!!!   Ira.


        On 4/21/2017 9:41 AM, chuck richards wrote:

        Dalibor,

        Thanks again for all that you do.

        You obviously have devoted your whole life for the past several
        years to the manufacturing of high-quality brand new large nixie
        tubes.

        There will always be some folks on the side-lines who want to
        talk about and to theorize about "better" and "cheaper" methods
        of tube production.

        Not bloody likely!!

        What you have accomplished is most remarkable!

        I especially like reading the part where you explain that
        computers and automation don't help much.

        That is a fact that people who have never tried any production
        methods will argue with.  But, as you point out, once one
        actually
        does their experiments and starts learning how to get it done,
        one
        will find that computers and automation just can't cope with the
        entire situation very well at all.

        Again, congratulations to you and your entire team of dedicated
        people!

        Chuck





        ---- Original Message ----
        From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        To: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        Subject: RE: [neonixie-l] Re: Manufacturing affordable large, new
        nixie tubes
        Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:16:33 -0700 (PDT)


        Hello!

        I am sending few notes to this topic, from a perspective of
        someone

        who

        spent last 5 years exclusively in nixie tubes manufacture ;-)

        IMHO, $25 nixie tube is not possible. Nixie tubes were never so

        cheap, even

        in 60s, the less expensive tube from Burroughs was for $8
        (equal to

        today's

        $64) when bought in a quantity of 1000pcs, type B-5016, no
        mercury.

        Large

        tube (B-7094) were for $30 (today's $240). In this time, the
        nixie

        tubes

        were cutting edge technology with generous budget, hoard of R&D

        engineers

        and whole tube backing industry. They were produced in large

        quantities for

        lot of equipment, mostly measuring devices - almost never for

        digital

        clocks, they were simply expensive for consumer market.
        You can now find small tubes on eBay for around $5, mostly
        russian

        tubes -

        their price is now determined by market (what are hobbyists
        willing

        to pay

        for it), not manufacturing costs. They were produced in large

        volumes in

        soviet central planned economy, even when the demand was
        decreasing

        - this

        is why there are still full stocks of them in former soviet

        countries.

        You mention "current manufacturing methods", we actually dont
        have

        much new

        technologies which could simplify the nixie tube manufacture. The

        use of

        computers is very limited and doesnt help much. Also new

        technologies like

        laser cutting etc. doesnt help (only for machinery construction,

        jigs..).

        There are tens of operations involved in the

        assembly/sealing/pumping

        procedures - the quantity of machines needed for automated line

        would be

        big and their price very high. As NeonJohn suggested - few $M
        would

        be

        necessary just for the machinery. You would also soon find that

        automation

        make demands on supplier's tolerances ( e.g. glass thickness,

        diameter)

        which is beyond their standard production capabilities = back to

        hand

        processing.. This is one of the reason why large factories like

        Blackburn

        had own facilities for production of all the raw
        materials/prefabs.
        Last year, I had a meeting with people from german company
        producing
        glassworking machines - simple semiautomated machine just for

        sealing

        operation (stem/envelope) which still needs operator starts at

        $250.000 and

        its production capacity is not so high (my estimation was 30

        tubes/hour).

        And this is one of very few pieces of equipment you can purchase,

        the rest

        is necessary to develop - according to your specifications and

        process

        description.

        But even if you had a fully equiped factory now, it would take
        you

        long

        time to get to working nixie tubes. It is not about machines, but

        about the

        operator/R&D - you need to know when the tube is sufficiently

        degassed

        before filling, what purity of the raw material is necessary,
        purity

        of the

        gases, time for aging etc.. Many factors, each of them can
        make your

        tube

        prone to failure. Not immediately, but after year of operation
        for

        instance

        - your backers will not wait years until you come up with working
        combination..

        Some data from our business:
        - Our price for a tube is now set to $145.
        - We make around 130 tubes per month (+ handful of clocks) with

        monthly

        revenue of around 20.000 USD.
        - We are now a team of 5 people and this production volume
        makes us

        really

        busy (I work 7 days a week, all day long).
        - We need 250 square meters (2700sqft) of space for our current

        equipment.

        - As for the "butique price" - my monthly net salary is $384,
        I get

        paid

        since February 2017 ;-) But my people's salary is above
        average (for

        a

        given profession and our region).
        - I invested around $80.000 from my personal savings on the

        beginning

        I know that if I want to really succeed and earn money, I need to

        cut down

        the production costs. So I am step by step making our manufacture

        efficient

        with the intention to make our nixie tubes less expensive one
        day. I

        am

        investing our profit back to tooling/equipment, I am for example

        working on

        a high vacuum rotary manifold for carousel pumping machine with

        higher

        production capacity. I recently reverse-engineered Philips vacuum

        locking

        mechanism (tube clamping) for the same machine. But I am not
        sure if

        it is

        possible to make nixie tubes for below $60-80 even with high
        level

        of

        automation.

        I hope it doesnt sound too discouraging ;-) just my $0.02

        best regards,

        Dalibor Farny


        On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 11:52:06 UTC+2, Aiden Koh wrote:

        I'm a product engineer taking on a new project.
        With current manufacturing methods, I'm able to manufacture

        In-18/Z568M

            inspired nixie tubes, at a fraction of their market costs
            (sub 25

        USD/pc).

            I don't compromise on quality. hence, it will be built
            with parts

        mostly

            sourced from the US, and have the quality management system

        ISO-certified.

            However, due to overhead costs, such a price is only
            available if

        the

            minimum demand for said tubes is reached. Hence I can only

        commence with

            the project when I know that there is enough interest.

            What are your thoughts? Would it interest you if such
            tubes exist?

        show

            your support, and large, affordable nixie tubes may
            finally be

        within our

            grasp!

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
        Google

        Groups "neonixie-l" group.

        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

        send an email to [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>.

        To post to this group, send an email to
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
        To view this discussion on the web, visit

        https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/7b6b98ca-36c7-42e5-a93f-

        9099a6830ca6%40googlegroups.com <http://40googlegroups.com>.

        For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



        $4.95/mo. National Dialup, Anti-Spam, Anti-Virus, 5mb personal
        web space. 5x faster dialup for only $9.95/mo. No contracts,
        No fees, No Kidding! See http://www.All2Easy.net for more
        details!

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "neonixie-l" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.

    To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To view this discussion on the web, visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/85fb4bcf-90a6-9faf-4690-adc455c2f270%40jb-electronics.de
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/85fb4bcf-90a6-9faf-4690-adc455c2f270%40jb-electronics.de?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.



    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "neonixie-l" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To view this discussion on the web, visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAJrqPH8foJmFRLyinnXW%2Bx-e33G78UxVFrDCtfyH%2BVwZVRt0nA%40mail.gmail.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAJrqPH8foJmFRLyinnXW%2Bx-e33G78UxVFrDCtfyH%2BVwZVRt0nA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/f24c4ab3-9c5a-3792-050b-bede9a205165%40HUGHES.NET <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/f24c4ab3-9c5a-3792-050b-bede9a205165%40HUGHES.NET?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/58fb8df8.c27b240a.7dc7f.ad01%40mx.google.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/58fb8df8.c27b240a.7dc7f.ad01%40mx.google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/ec443d18-869b-8c6a-1bd4-e74aab6115ef%40HUGHES.NET.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

<<attachment: IRACOSALES.vcf>>

Reply via email to