Hi,

first: interesting & very useful webpage ! (recognized your nickname). 
Appreciate people who share information like that.

Increasing frequency will only result in maxing out duty cycles. Not sure 
if I tested the RLB on >= 60kHz yet though, I'll 
give it a go later.

What frequency are you at, approximately ?

Assuming you're using the MC34063, I'm not sure how the PWM scheme looks on 
that one. Have you tried peeling off 
the outer shrink tube on the inductor ?  At first I didn't think there was 
any significant heat, until I realized the shrink tube 
was messing with me.

Anyways, I found some nice off-the shelf transformers which looks very 
promising in simulation, so I'm heading for 
flyback. Slightly more expensive though, but not a concern for me.


- Oyvind

On Monday, November 12, 2018 at 9:45:51 PM UTC+1, threeneurons wrote:
>
> I think your doing something wrong. I use the RLB9012-101KL routinely, and 
> get twice the output current (~35mA @ 180V), while the coil gets warm, but 
> still within reason. I'd suggest that you increase your switching 
> frequency. I suspect you're well into saturation.
>
> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 12:12:29 AM UTC-8, Oyvind wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been experimenting a bit with single inductor supplies. I built 
>> one myself based on TPS40210, and tried a couple of others too.
>>
>> Common for all, is that the inductor gets quite hot when running them on 
>> a 10K dummy load @180V. 
>>
>> So, for 6 IN-14 tubes on 1.5 mA each, they work just fine, but not much 
>> more than that.
>>
>> I tried various inductors, with fairly high amp ratings:
>>
>>
>> - shielded SMD ones have most pronounced. That is, I can hold my finger 
>> on it, but just barely.
>> - radial THT, souch as Bourns RLB9012-101KL. When peeling off the outer 
>> coating, the heat is obvious
>> - toroids with low ohms / high amps. These gives best result, but gets 
>> "luke warm".
>>
>> I'm thinking that having a supply like that inside a casing would not be 
>> good in the long run. I am aiming for non-multiplexed..
>>
>> Not sure how to remedy this (snubber or similar ?), perhaps this topology 
>> isn't the most ideal. 
>>
>>
>> What's your experiences here ?
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/dcb1f4d6-c436-4118-aa95-66ea3f6278a4%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to