IN-4 tubes aren’t doped with mercury.

> On May 3, 2019, at 11:03 PM, Justin Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks. I'm hoping to use the IN-4. I like the circular bulb and they're a 
> good size for the front panel of a stereo.
> 
>> On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 11:05:46 AM UTC-4, Paul Andrews wrote:
>> You mean PWM it (because they don't latch on)? Yes, this is how you dim 
>> them. There is some anecdotal evidence to indicate that this does indeed 
>> lengthen tube life. However, if the tube is doped with mercury, the life is 
>> in the 100,000s of hours. For undoped tubes it is around 10,000 hours. So 
>> let us know what tubes you plan to use. The very common (and very robust) 
>> IN-12 are long-life. Some people find the '5' digit on them annoying...
>> 
>>> On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 11:01:39 AM UTC-4, Justin Scott wrote:
>>> Right. Or to turn a digit on you could switch the cathode quickly, so there 
>>> would be lower current on average moving through the tube. I assume this 
>>> would lengthen tube life, but sounds like it's not necessary.
>>> 
>>>> On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 10:33:30 AM UTC-4, Paul Andrews wrote:
>>>> Perhaps I misunderstand, but each digit is a cathode. To turn it on, pull 
>>>> it ground, to turn it off let it float or push it to around 80V.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 8:10:15 AM UTC-4, Justin Scott wrote:
>>>>> Thank you! I completely understand now. My design will be direct-drive, 
>>>>> so I won't need to switch the anode. Will I need to switch the cathode 
>>>>> though, or can I just leave it on continuously?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 10:43:20 AM UTC-4, gregebert wrote:
>>>>>> Switching the anodes is what multiplexing does, the advantage being that 
>>>>>> you can share the cathode logic across several tubes. But with savings, 
>>>>>> there is also a hidden cost: You must run the anode current higher for 
>>>>>> multiplexed operation versus direct-drive. If the tube is specifically 
>>>>>> designed to support higher peak-current for multiplexing, then there's 
>>>>>> minimal risk; I recall some Burroughs tubes state in the datasheet not 
>>>>>> to use multiplexing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've done a number of clock designs, all of them direct-drive. Cost is a 
>>>>>> secondary concern; maximizing the life of the almost- irreplaceable 
>>>>>> nixie tube is the overriding goal. With direct-drive, you dont need to 
>>>>>> switch the anode. However, I have some designs that use anode 
>>>>>> current-regulators which is basically a switch that is not fully-on.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ghosting only occurs with a muliplexed display, so if you are concerned 
>>>>>> about it, be sure that your design has programmable blanking-time, 
>>>>>> refresh-rate, and on-time. You will have to experiment to get the best 
>>>>>> results.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neonixie-l/gIa9ngzJVKk/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/2552f2c0-cca1-4269-b857-ce0826bf62e4%40googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/2FF9C02A-AF4B-4C11-B40F-78E8AB03CA0E%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to