On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:42:04 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Can I please get a review for this test-only change which proposes to skip 
>> this test when the `main()` is launched through a virtual thread?
>> 
>> This test was introduced in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8233018 , 
>> before virtual threads were introduced. In its current form the test doesn't 
>> take into account the specification of `DatagramSocket.receive()` when a 
>> virtual thread is doing the `receive()`. There's already the 
>> `test/jdk/java/net/vthread/BlockingSocketOps.java` test which exercises the 
>> `receive()` through a virtual thread and verifies its specified behaviour, 
>> so we can skip this `InterruptibleDatagramSocket` test when a virtual thread 
>> is involved.
>> 
>> With the proposed change, the test no longer fails and is reported as 
>> skipped by jtreg.
>
> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Alan's review - update skip reason

Marked as reviewed by lmesnik (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23074#pullrequestreview-2547132609

Reply via email to