On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 15:14:22 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Hello Daniel, My initial idea was to change this test the exact same way as >> you propose. However, as I note in the JBS issue, the test fails with >> virtual threads even then: >> >>> The test expects the SocketException that gets thrown in such cases to have >>> a exception cause of ClosedByInterruptException. >>> ... >>> I don't see that specified in the DatagramSocket.receive(), so it might be >>> that we will have to re-evaluate that test code separately. >> >> I did not want to block any of Leonid's testing work in this area so I >> decided to skip this test for now. I plan to re-evaluate this test code as a >> separate task. > > Makes sense. I've created https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8347756 to re-evaluate that catch block in this test. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23074#discussion_r1915830175
