>>>>> On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:52:37 +0000, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> Do you mean that the difference between the two header file names Dave> should be more distinctive, or that there should only be one header Dave> file? Meaning we should use the *old* name (the one people know about) instead of creating a new one. If we're going to replace something, make it as transparent as possible unless there is a good reason not to (and in this case I don't think there is). You're not going to easily get people to use the new code if it isn't turned on easily in the fashion they're used to. Dave> But I'd also suggest that we revert to 'disman/event.h' for the Dave> new implmentation, and use 'disman/event-mib.h' to issue a warning Dave> about the existence of the two alternatives. Dave> That's a useful feature (IMO) that we've currently lost. I think we shouldn't have 2. As I said, IMHO, we should have the following: disman/event-mib.h -> new code disman/old-event-mib.h -> old code But, I'm a lone voice and not the implementer so I won't win ;-) -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
