On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:52:37 +0000 Dave wrote:
DS> One of the concerns expressed when I first submitted my new code,
DS> was that people who were using the original implementation
DS> might want to continue using that version.
But you've claimed that there are no backwards-compatibility issues, and that
the new code works perfectly, right? ;-)
DS> They wouldn't be switched over silently.
DS>
DS> Now I'm quite happy for the project to push my code for me :-)
I think Wes and I agree that we should push your code, and even do so
silently. We have complete confidence in your code.
DS> > It seems wiser to me to move the old header to old-disman-event.h
DS> > or something so people have to explicitly request it.
DS>
DS> That sounds good to me.
DS> But I'd also suggest that we revert to 'disman/event.h' for the
DS> new implmentation, and use 'disman/event-mib.h' to issue a warning
DS> about the existence of the two alternatives.
I don't particularly like this option, but will bend to the will of the
people. I would argue that the header name for the old code should indicated
it is the old code. Otherwise how are the clueless going to know which is
better, event or event-mib?
--
NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted
unless they are requests for paid consulting services.
Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie
Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp>
Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders>
You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
