Dave Shield wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 01:14 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
1) Dropping 'dist' from the patches branches
and always keep it in MAIN only.
3) Keep 'dist' in CVS *only* and do *not* ship
it in the source distribution at all.
I'm not sure I grasp the difference between these two.
Isn't MAIN the CVS tree anyway?
That's be my preference anyway, however it's numbered.
So, to double-check, you're preferring to:
- keep "dist" in CVS MAIN only *and*
- do not ship "dist" with the source distribution?
However, we will still need to ship some of the "dist" content
(net-snmp.spec, snmpd-init.d, snmptrapd-init.d) with e.g. source RPMs.
Besides, I think this discussion should also cover the "win32/dist" dir
which looks somewhat similar to the top-level "dist" dir -- just for
Win32 instead of UN*X-alikes. Alex?
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
