>>>>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:34:44 -0500, Bill Fenner <fen...@gmail.com> said:
BF> It's somehow a regression against net-snmp 5.5, so IMO it is more BF> important for 5.6. I can't explain what is different in 5.5 that it BF> worked with the same code, but it did. I suspect luck was involved. I suspect if you ran it on a different architecture it may have even reared it's head. It certainly is interesting... Cause the problem is definitely there in both releases. -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
