of course! looking forward to seeing how it develops and to participating...
m.

--- On Wed, 10/21/09, marc garrett <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: marc garrett <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] DIWO is back, but with a difference...
> To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity" 
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 2:07 PM
> Hi Michael,
> 
> I agree with much of what you say, and and very interested
> in seeing how 
> it is explored by anyone on their terms local and
> non-local, networked 
> or non-networked...
> 
> I think that the ironies will be 'ironed' out (scuze pun)
> as the process 
> of it all begins to expand, beyond the literature's remit
> thus showing 
> alternative visions that take the theme yet in ways to
> allow a 
> re-invention accordingly.
> 
> I see that the DIWO aspect will bring light and
> ideas/imagination to it 
> which conventional behaviours have not touched upon yet,
> lets see...
> 
> marc
> > I'm sure this will be a really interesting project.
> The last DIWO thing was great. I am glad, however, that
> there is a question mark after the title.
> > I find stuff like this (from the manifesto):
> >
> > "The idea of civilisation is entangled, right down to
> its semantic roots, with city-dwelling, and this provokes a
> thought: if our writers seem unable to find new stories
> which might lead us through the times ahead, is this not a
> function of their metropolitan mentality? The big names of
> contemporary literature are equally at home in the
> fashionable quarters of London or New York, and their
> writing reflects the prejudices of the placeless,
> transnational elite to which they belong." 
> >
> > profoundly worrying. The privileging of the local (and
> the imagined rural) in this way would have felt quite
> uncontroversial to Heidegger and his more thuggish friends
> and "metropolitan mentality and equally at home in ..London
> and New York" has for me a close to the nerve echo of
> "rootless cosmopolitanism" (Google it).
> >
> > I hope, furthemore, the irony of the call and much of
> the subsequent work and discussion taking place on the
> internet (which could only have meaning, let alone 
> exist, at a certain level of civilisation) isn't lost on
> anyone.
> >
> > Of course none of that means it can't be a useful and
> interesting starting point for work. Of course it is. Let's
> keep our critical faculties sharp around any accompanying
> discussion though.
> > michael
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Wed, 10/21/09, marc garrett <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> From: marc garrett <[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] DIWO is back, but with
> a difference...
> >> To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed
> creativity" <[email protected]>
> >> Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 1:17 PM
> >> Hi Dave,
> >>
> >> Excellent - it's going to be a 'THRILLER'...
> >>
> >> An update on the press release for this project -
> I will
> >> not let the 
> >> outside world know about this till tomorrow
> afternoon now.
> >>
> >> There are couple of other factors which need
> ironing out
> >> before then, 
> >> but I thought it would be useful to mention it
> before the
> >> intensity of 
> >> it all suddenly just happens.
> >>
> >> wishing you well.
> >>
> >> marc
> >>     
> >>> great marc
> >>>
> >>> I'll do something!
> >>>
> >>> dave
> >>>
> >>> 2009/10/21 marc garrett <[email protected]>:
> >>>    
> >>>       
> >>>> Hi Netnehaviourists,
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, DIWO is back again and as before,
> anyone can
> >>>>         
> >> get involved.
> >>     
> >>>> All contributions will be shown at the
> HTTP
> >>>>         
> >> Gallery again -
> >>     
> >>>> http://www.http.uk.net/
> >>>>
> >>>> We will also have the same policy of open
> curation
> >>>>         
> >> like last time, where
> >>     
> >>>> people can view hanging via a web cam and
> chat on
> >>>>         
> >> IRS, as well as other
> >>     
> >>>> collaborators visiting the space on a
> selected
> >>>>         
> >> day.
> >>     
> >>>> There are 2 extra elements this time as
> well as
> >>>>         
> >> the collaboration
> >>     
> >>>> happening within the email list:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1 - we will be asking contributors to send
> work
> >>>>         
> >> via snail mail
> >>     
> >>>> (traditional postage), as well as/or
> alternately.
> >>>>
> >>>> And we have a theme this year: Do It With
> Others
> >>>>         
> >> at the Dark Mountain?
> >>     
> >>>> Before taking part we are asking everyone
> to read
> >>>>         
> >> the Manifesto below:
> >>     
> >>>> UNCIVILISATION THE DARK MOUNTAIN
> MANIFESTO
> >>>> http://www.dark-mountain.net/about-2/the-manifesto/
> >>>>
> >>>> Then contribute with the theme in mind...
> >>>>
> >>>> We will be releasing a press release to
> the rest
> >>>>         
> >> of the world, and on
> >>     
> >>>> this list later on.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> wishing you all well.
> >>>>
> >>>> marc
> >>>>
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________
> >>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >>>>
> >>>>      
> >>>>         
> >>>
> _______________________________________________
> >>> NetBehaviour mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >>>
> >>>    
> >>>       
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NetBehaviour mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >>
> >>     
> > _______________________________________________
> > NetBehaviour mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >
> >   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to