Here is the script for Amanda Steggell's performance/lecture titled "Dramatical NN", 2002. Featuring many (still) prominent actors on the scene... <http://www.liveart.org/motherboard/articles/ 02_dramatical.html>
Best, Per +++++++++++++++++++ Mob: +47 9306 9406 http://www.perplatou.net On 12 Jul 2010, at 00:56, Simon Biggs wrote: > Spammer art was a pain when we all had dial up and slow connections. > It cost > money as we paid for the minute (or MB). These days, for most of us, > spam, > art or not, is more an annoyance than an injury. However, there are > many > parts of the world who are still on capped, slow and pay per unit > connections. In that context it is potentially arrogant, even > injurious, to > deluge people with data who weren't expecting it. > > Best > > Simon > > > Simon Biggs > [email protected] [email protected] > Skype: simonbiggsuk > http://www.littlepig.org.uk/ > > Research Professor edinburgh college of art > http://www.eca.ac.uk/ > Creative Interdisciplinary Research into CoLlaborative Environments > http://www.eca.ac.uk/circle/ > Electronic Literature as a Model of Creativity and Innovation in > Practice > http://www.elmcip.net/ > Centre for Film, Performance and Media Arts > http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/film-performance-media-arts > > >> From: Helen Sloan <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity >> <[email protected]> >> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:19:40 +0100 >> To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me >> >> Dear Karens, >> >> I remember Integer, NN etc well and spent hours deleting their >> prolific >> contributions to listings – some of which I looked at and others went >> unread. It’s true that there was a mass exodus from Syndicate >> during that >> time which was a pity as it did good things – and it never really >> recovered. >> Finally, I understood what was going on but felt a little sad as >> well. I’m >> not up for a culture that’s worth preserving eating itself. >> >> I’m all for this activity in a way but why ( as happened in >> Syndicate’s >> case) do it to ourselves? There must be much more of a statement to >> be made >> to do it in other contexts. In this respect, I really liked what >> Heath >> Bunting and Rachel Baker et al did with supermarkets at about the >> same time >> as these others. >> >> We’re entering hard times and in my opinion we should be careful >> about the >> way we do these kinds of interventions now. >> >> But hey, you can tell me that I don’t understand and I can take it. >> Just a >> thought. I look forward to hearing more from Karens but hope you >> don’t >> implode. >> >> Best >> Helen >> Helen Sloan >> SCAN >> >> >> On 11/7/10 21:40, "Michael Szpakowski" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I absolutely agree that this is more interesting than the >>> Mandiberg, and for >>> much the same reasons. Certainly there's a wild unpredictability >>> to the >>> ceding >>> of something so personal as an e mail address which in terms of >>> *real* >>> consequences might play out much more creatively than the actually >>> rather >>> measured, prescriptive & essentially conservative feel of the MM >>> piece. >>> (There always seemed to be a continual *desperation* with him to >>> be on top of >>> the next new thing, even when the result in art terms was not all >>> that >>> interesting. >>> However he was a good egg in that he voluntarily gave his time to >>> running an >>> excellent calls and opps list for several years & for that I am >>> grateful...) >>> cheers >>> michael >>> >>> --- On Sun, 7/11/10, Ruth Catlow <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Ruth Catlow <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me >>>> To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity" >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Sunday, July 11, 2010, 5:46 PM >>>> >>>> Great stuff so far Karen(s) and Marc and Michael and Alan, >>>> >>>> It seems to me Karen that you are likely to be closer to nn than >>>> to "the >>>> essential guide to mandiberg"... >>>> more anarcho-cyborg than the bureaucractic-art-twonk that is the >>>> over-surveyed subject of mandiberg's alter-ego; ) >>>> >>>> I think that's something to do with that fact that you are >>>> inviting people >>>> to >>>> join you by opening up your email. >>>> It is not "about" being multiple. >>>> It "is" being multiple. >>>> >>>> You have already told us a bit about your celebrity art parents. >>>> >>>> Do you feel that you are following in their footsteps? >>>> >>>> Why have you issued this invitation to join you now? And why by >>>> email when >>>> everyone is so busy socialising in sites like Facebook and Twitter? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Ruth >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: karen blissett <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:karen%20blissett%20%[email protected]%3e> > >>>> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity >>>> <[email protected] >>>> > <mailto:NetBehaviour%20for%20networked%20distributed%20creativity%20%3cnetbe > >>> > h >>>> [email protected]%3e> > >>>> To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity >>>> <[email protected] >>>> > <mailto:NetBehaviour%20for%20networked%20distributed%20creativity%20%3cnetbe > >>> > h >>>> [email protected]%3e> > >>>> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me >>>> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:37:15 +0100 >>>> >>>> So...yes please Ruth >>>> >>>> perhaps the interview has already started. >>>> >>>> :) >>>> Karen >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ruth Catlow >>>> <[email protected] >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi Karen, >>>>> >>>>> What an intriguing idea brimming with subversive potential; ) >>>>> I would like to join you. >>>>> >>>>> But before I "speak and act as you" I would like to "speak to >>>>> you" to find >>>>> out more about you and why you have decided to to do this. >>>>> >>>>> How would you feel about a short interview here in the >>>>> Netbehaviour list? >>>>> >>>>> very best things >>>>> Ruth >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: karen blissett <[email protected] >>>>> <mailto:karen%20blissett%20%[email protected]%3e> > >>>>> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity >>>>> <[email protected] >>>>> > <mailto:NetBehaviour%20for%20networked%20distributed%20creativity%20%3cnetb > >>>> > e >>>>> [email protected]%3e> > >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: [NetBehaviour] Invitation to join me >>>>> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:43:24 +0100 >>>>> >>>>> Dear Friends. >>>>> >>>>> Please join me. >>>>> >>>>> Literally. >>>>> >>>>> I want to become more open and free, with a more distributed >>>>> identity. >>>>> >>>>> So if you would like to take a break from yourself and speak and >>>>> act as me >>>>> instead, please drop me a personal email. >>>>> >>>>> If I trust you I will send you my password and you can start >>>>> expressing me. >>>>> >>>>> Can't wait! >>>>> >>>>> Karen Blissett >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NetBehaviour mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > > > Edinburgh College of Art (eca) is a charity registered in Scotland, > number SC009201 > > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
