cf: http://playdamage.org/manifest-o-matic


>I agree with you here - also Olson's on field poetry (forget the exact
>title). But it's the heart of absolutism that manifestos also offer that
>can be a problem.
>
>- Alan
>
>On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Edward Picot wrote:
>
>>   I'm very late coming to this, because I tend to let Netbehaviour posts
>>  pile up and then trawl through them a week or so at a time, but this has
>>  been a very absorbing thread, especially the exchange between Alan and
>>  Curt about significance in art, art-teaching, etc.
>>
>>  I'd just like to say a belated word in defence of manifestos. I'm quite
>>  anti-manifesto personally, in the sense that I don't personally want to
>>  get involved with one, or can't think of one with which I would want to
>>  get involved; but I can see that they sometimes serve their purpose.
>>  Radically new art sometimes has to create the critical framework from
>>  which it should be judged, and manifestos can help with this. Being a
>>  literary sort of person I'm thinking of things like the Imagist
>>  manifesto, George Eliot's lengthy remarks about realism in literature in
>>  Scenes from Clerical Life (or was it Adam Bede?) and Wordsworth and
>>  Coleridge's preface to The Lyrical Ballads, with its plea that poetry
>>  should be written in "language really used by men" instead of the
>>  highly-artificial diction favoured by the Augustans. Exciting ideas, and
>>  ideas which helped to alter the course of our literature.
>>
>>  - Edward
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  NetBehaviour mailing list
>>  [email protected]
>>  http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
>>
>
>
>==
>email archive: http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
>webpage http://www.alansondheim.org
>music archive: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
>==
>_______________________________________________
>NetBehaviour mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to