Das utopisch eschatologische Denken ist im Kern zerstörerisch, weil es sich auf Macht gründet

Unknown source

Via Michel Jacobs - Dutch independent horse rider

This goes for all kind of analytical philosophical and or art manifestos.

-Presuming, you all know how to read German, the philosophers language par excelence, besides Greek and Latin-

Apert from tightly connected with 'nous' as in 'mind', 'intellect', manifestos expressing ideals, political polemics or otherwise will ultimately fail in the 'Semantic Trap', cf. Kant and also my dear compadre Vladimir Solovyov.

Apophatic philosopher from Czaristic Russia i.e. before Marx his star rose but after Hegel succes as influential western thinker.

Also of importance is his interest in Baruch d'Espinoza as the most important political thinker about pre-liberalism and contra establisment activist during the Enlightment

So the failure of a one size fits it all doctrine is well grounded in critical Western thinking, as all monotheistic sytems will sooner or later dramatically fail.

Well worth to take note of his importance in this discussion

Feel free to Google him in your precious 'free' time.

Always interested in all kind of mental abberations, yours truly

"Let that 'God', disguised as Art, State Control or Poetry forever vanish in the dustbin of human history"

Andreas Maria Jacobs

w: http://www.nictoglobe.com
w: http://burgerwaanzin.nl

"Politics is the Architecture of Death"

On 21 Oct 2010, at 20:17, Edward Picot <[email protected]> wrote:

I'm very late coming to this, because I tend to let Netbehaviour posts pile up and then trawl through them a week or so at a time, but this has
been a very absorbing thread, especially the exchange between Alan and
Curt about significance in art, art-teaching, etc.

I'd just like to say a belated word in defence of manifestos. I'm quite anti-manifesto personally, in the sense that I don't personally want to get involved with one, or can't think of one with which I would want to
get involved; but I can see that they sometimes serve their purpose.
Radically new art sometimes has to create the critical framework from
which it should be judged, and manifestos can help with this. Being a
literary sort of person I'm thinking of things like the Imagist
manifesto, George Eliot's lengthy remarks about realism in literature in
Scenes from Clerical Life (or was it Adam Bede?) and Wordsworth and
Coleridge's preface to The Lyrical Ballads, with its plea that poetry
should be written in "language really used by men" instead of the
highly-artificial diction favoured by the Augustans. Exciting ideas, and
ideas which helped to alter the course of our literature.

- Edward
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to