It became about something more important than griefing and spam. IP and money 
came into the picture and, eventually, lawyers. It was a mess and NN came out 
of it on the sticky end.

best

Simon


On 9 Sep 2011, at 18:44, Paul Hertz wrote:

> As someone who was on the Cycling74 list for the whole sweep of NN's 
> intervention, what strikes me was how variable the messages were. If (her) 
> intervention had been purely an effort to spam, NN would have been booted 
> immediately. But NN was inventive, frequently a very useful contributor, and 
> even the spammy bits were charged with a degree of humor: pickled theory 
> generated by a textbot. 
> 
> Of course it got hard to take, and the gradually escalating feuding poisoned 
> the list, in the end displacing all the mostly welcome or merely irritating 
> posts.
> 
> -- Paul
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Simon Biggs <si...@littlepig.org.uk> wrote:
> Who was voting? There was a period, back when NN was active, when the Net was 
> smaller and less commercialised. In that context a certain sample of users 
> would have known NN and voted for her. Nowadays the net is a different 
> universe, dominated by big business and government policy. It is only going 
> to be more like that. It is the infrastructure of the knowledge economy - and 
> government and business have a particular understanding of what the term 
> economy means: making money and creating jobs/consumers. As I often work at 
> the juncture of academic research (into the internet), government policy and 
> commercial development it is clear to me that the net's future is nothing 
> like its past - and the future is now.
> 
> My students have little or no knowledge of the early net. They know it 
> through Facebook, Twitter, blogs, BBC, apps and other commercial and/or 
> custom portals. They haven't the faintest what The Well is, much less 
> Nettime, Thing or 7-11. In the case of 7-11 you cannot teach them about it as 
> the archives and other traces have been so effectively removed. Only 
> individual artist's documentation exists - but that isn't the same. 7-11 was 
> a creative community/happening and it would be great to present it as it was 
> then, in its entirety. I only have my own archive (probably 25% of the 
> material) to show them.
> 
> Many of our researchers also have little knowledge of these early examples of 
> net culture. Some do (the artists, media nuts, anthropologists, etc) but 
> those working between academe and industry (which is most) simply aren't 
> interested. They see the net as the saviour of TV and publishing. They 
> recognise it is fundamentally different - but their response is not to 
> consider cultural alternatives but to work out new business models (eg: 
> social media means social gaming linked to a network TV series). I'm sorry it 
> is like that, but it's how it is. At this point we probably need an 
> under-net, and it is possible that list serves (like usenet, almost a subject 
> for media archeology) are that.
> 
> Ana is right that list serves are dying. The number of people on the net has 
> exploded but the numbers using list serves have shrunk. Many artistic 
> communities that once communicated via list serves have moved to blog, nings 
> or Facebook groups. Google+ Circles, despite the failure of Google Wave, are 
> the next development. Alan, you make good use of that...
> 
> best
> 
> Simon
> 
> 
> On 9 Sep 2011, at 17:48, Alan Sondheim wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > She was actually voted one of the 25 most important women on the Net. I
> > had some dealing with her. And everyone I knew, knew her - she might have
> > been better known in the US; NATO55 was in a lot of places.
> >
> > On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Simon Biggs wrote:
> >
> >> Seems to overstate both the worth of turn of the Century network culture 
> >> (we are talking about a few hundred people here on a list serve or two) 
> >> and NN. More like a sub-cultural splinter group... Of all the people on 
> >> the internet I doubt more than 0.01% have ever heard of NN. Hardly 
> >> infamous.
> >>
> >> (but as NN is eternally prescient I am sure I will now be burned to a 
> >> crisp ;)
> >>
> >> best
> >>
> >> Simon
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9 Sep 2011, at 14:25, marc garrett wrote:
> >>
> >>> Netochka Nezvanova.
> >>>
> >>> One of the most famous and infamous EccentricCharacters in
> >>> turn?of?the?21st Century Western artistic NetworkCulture, Netochka
> >>> Nezvanova (aka N.N., antiorp, integer, Irena Sabine Czubera) remains an
> >>> enigma to many. Widely believed to be an IdentityCollective?, Netochka
> >>> Nezvanova is a PenName named after the title character in [an early
> >>> unfinished Fyodor Dostoevsky novel] whose name means "nameless nobody"
> >>> in Russian. The identity always presents itself as female, though it may
> >>> not be in reality. Despite the meaning of her moniker, N.N. has coveted
> >>> attention and recognition like few others on the Internet.
> >>>
> >>> http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/NetochkaNezvanova
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> NetBehaviour mailing list
> >>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> >>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Simon Biggs | si...@littlepig.org.uk | www.littlepig.org.uk
> >>
> >> s.bi...@ed.ac.uk | Edinburgh College of Art | University of Edinburgh
> >> www.eca.ac.uk/circle | www.elmcip.net | www.movingtargets.co.uk
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NetBehaviour mailing list
> >> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ==
> > eyebeam: http://eyebeam.org/blogs/alansondheim/
> > email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
> > web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 347-383-8552
> > music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
> > current text http://www.alansondheim.org/re.txt
> > ==
> > _______________________________________________
> > NetBehaviour mailing list
> > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >
> 
> 
> Simon Biggs | si...@littlepig.org.uk | www.littlepig.org.uk
> 
> s.bi...@ed.ac.uk | Edinburgh College of Art | University of Edinburgh
> www.eca.ac.uk/circle | www.elmcip.net | www.movingtargets.co.uk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -----   |(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)|   ---
> http://ignotus.com
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Simon Biggs | si...@littlepig.org.uk | www.littlepig.org.uk

s.bi...@ed.ac.uk | Edinburgh College of Art | University of Edinburgh
www.eca.ac.uk/circle | www.elmcip.net | www.movingtargets.co.uk

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to