Dibbell was writing about a MOO, Lambda MOO, somewhat different. I was a wizard on a couple and ran one out of the New School and we had running for the Cybermind conference. Right now I usually have one running in linux for language processing; they're lightweight and can be used for amazing textual manipulation/creation.

- ALan


On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Ana Vald?s wrote:

Does someone remember the MUDS? I was in one of them, invited by Howard
Rheingold, one of the real old timers, founder of the Wall and of a lot of
interesting communities, as Electric Minds.
People interacted at the MUDS in a similar way they do in Facebook or Second
Life.
I like Julian Dibbells book about the life inside a MUD :)
Ana

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Paul Hertz <[email protected]> wrote:
      As someone who was on the Cycling74 list for the whole sweep of
      NN's intervention, what strikes me was how variable the messages
      were. If (her) intervention had been purely an effort to spam,
      NN would have been booted immediately. But NN was inventive,
      frequently a very useful contributor, and even the spammy bits
      were charged with a degree of humor: pickled theory generated by
      a textbot.

      Of course it got hard to take, and the gradually escalating
      feuding poisoned the list, in the end displacing all the mostly
      welcome or merely irritating posts.

      -- Paul



On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Simon Biggs <[email protected]>
wrote:
      Who was voting? There was a period, back when NN was
      active, when the Net was smaller and less commercialised.
      In that context a certain sample of users would have known
      NN and voted for her. Nowadays the net is a different
      universe, dominated by big business and government policy.
      It is only going to be more like that. It is the
      infrastructure of the knowledge economy - and government
      and business have a particular understanding of what the
      term economy means: making money and creating
      jobs/consumers. As I often work at the juncture of
      academic research (into the internet), government policy
      and commercial development it is clear to me that the
      net's future is nothing like its past - and the future is
      now.

      My students have little or no knowledge of the early net.
      They know it through Facebook, Twitter, blogs, BBC, apps
      and other commercial and/or custom portals. They haven't
      the faintest what The Well is, much less Nettime, Thing or
      7-11. In the case of 7-11 you cannot teach them about it
      as the archives and other traces have been so effectively
      removed. Only individual artist's documentation exists -
      but that isn't the same. 7-11 was a creative
      community/happening and it would be great to present it as
      it was then, in its entirety. I only have my own archive
      (probably 25% of the material) to show them.

      Many of our researchers also have little knowledge of
      these early examples of net culture. Some do (the artists,
      media nuts, anthropologists, etc) but those working
      between academe and industry (which is most) simply aren't
      interested. They see the net as the saviour of TV and
      publishing. They recognise it is fundamentally different -
      but their response is not to consider cultural
      alternatives but to work out new business models (eg:
      social media means social gaming linked to a network TV
      series). I'm sorry it is like that, but it's how it is. At
      this point we probably need an under-net, and it is
      possible that list serves (like usenet, almost a subject
      for media archeology) are that.

      Ana is right that list serves are dying. The number of
      people on the net has exploded but the numbers using list
      serves have shrunk. Many artistic communities that once
      communicated via list serves have moved to blog, nings or
      Facebook groups. Google+ Circles, despite the failure of
      Google Wave, are the next development. Alan, you make good
      use of that...

      best

      Simon


On 9 Sep 2011, at 17:48, Alan Sondheim wrote:

>
>
> She was actually voted one of the 25 most important women on
the Net. I
> had some dealing with her. And everyone I knew, knew her - she
might have
> been better known in the US; NATO55 was in a lot of places.
>
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Simon Biggs wrote:
>
>> Seems to overstate both the worth of turn of the Century
network culture (we are talking about a few hundred people here
on a list serve or two) and NN. More like a sub-cultural
splinter group... Of all the people on the internet I doubt more
than 0.01% have ever heard of NN. Hardly infamous.
>>
>> (but as NN is eternally prescient I am sure I will now be
burned to a crisp ;)
>>
>> best
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> On 9 Sep 2011, at 14:25, marc garrett wrote:
>>
>>> Netochka Nezvanova.
>>>
>>> One of the most famous and infamous EccentricCharacters in
>>> turn?of?the?21st Century Western artistic NetworkCulture,
Netochka
>>> Nezvanova (aka N.N., antiorp, integer, Irena Sabine Czubera)
remains an
>>> enigma to many. Widely believed to be an
IdentityCollective?, Netochka
>>> Nezvanova is a PenName named after the title character in
[an early
>>> unfinished Fyodor Dostoevsky novel] whose name means
"nameless nobody"
>>> in Russian. The identity always presents itself as female,
though it may
>>> not be in reality. Despite the meaning of her moniker, N.N.
has coveted
>>> attention and recognition like few others on the Internet.
>>>
>>> http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/NetochkaNezvanova
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>>
>>
>>
>> Simon Biggs | [email protected] | www.littlepig.org.uk
>>
>> [email protected] | Edinburgh College of Art | University of
Edinburgh
>> www.eca.ac.uk/circle | www.elmcip.net |
www.movingtargets.co.uk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>
>>
>
> ==
> eyebeam: http://eyebeam.org/blogs/alansondheim/
> email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
> web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 347-383-8552
> music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
> current text http://www.alansondheim.org/re.txt
> ==
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>


Simon Biggs | [email protected] | www.littlepig.org.uk

[email protected] | Edinburgh College of Art | University of
Edinburgh
www.eca.ac.uk/circle | www.elmcip.net | www.movingtargets.co.uk

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour




--
-----   |(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)|   ---
http://ignotus.com

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour




--
http://www.twitter.com/caravia15852
http://www.scoop.it/t/art-and-activism/
http://www.scoop.it/t/food-history-and-trivia
http://www.scoop.it/t/gender-issues/
http://www.scoop.it/t/literary-exiles/
http://www.scoop.it/t/museums-and-ethics/
http://www.scoop.it/t/urbanism-3-0
http://www.scoop.it/t/postcolonial-mind/

mobil/cell +4670-3213370


"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your
eyes turned skyward, for there you have been and there you will always long
to return.
? Leonardo da Vinci



==
eyebeam: http://eyebeam.org/blogs/alansondheim/
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 347-383-8552
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/re.txt
==
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to