How can we think about free software or free culture living under: ICANN dictatorship ?Microprocessors dictatorship ? For the Empire Version 2.0 (facebook-google-twitter) is it interesting to have a license like creative commons where they can track without legal problems ? How about IPV6 and the limits of the net ? Can we talk about Culture Flat Rate ? How is it going ? Free Culture or freedom to track ? Free software but microprocessors dictatorship ? Digital Culture but living unde the process of digitalization of different culturessssssssssss ? (with a lot s - i mean plural)
How about the colonization of "real time" by USA with (google-facebook-twitter) ? From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:47:23 +0000 Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] My Lawyer is an Artist: Free Culture Licenses as Art Manifestos. Creative Commons is a NGO financed by Google (we are not evil :-))) and HP , invented and promoted by a Prof of Law from Havard, Larry Lessig. The same University that costs 25.000 per semester for a student , in Europe or in any other country of the world this will pay at least one year of studies and in same cases all the masters course. I am not against USA or Havard, i find for example Howard Gardner a great professor. Some goverments are adopting this license without even think about, the interests behind, who benefit from that ? Why the British goverment didnt accepted ? Free Software, Free Culture - this terms should be rethinked it is like Digital Culture - Are you free ? What is freedom ? Are we living under the digitalization of cultures instead of "digital culture" ? > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:47:47 +0000 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] My Lawyer is an Artist: Free Culture Licenses as > Art Manifestos. > > On 14/11/11 21:36, Secret Artist wrote: > > what's the difrence between copyleft and creative commons ? > > Copyleft is a particular way of licencing a copyrighted work in order to > restore the freedom that copyright removes. If you receive a copylefted > work you are free to use it as you wish. *As long as* you pass on that > freedom to others when you distribute copies of the work or works that > are based on it. You do this by placing them under the same licence. > > Creative Commons are an organization that produce a range of copyright > licences for cultural works. Their "Attribution ShareAlike" licence is a > copyleft licence. Most of their other licences aren't free for any > common definition of free-as-in-freedom. > > It's confusing to talk about "Creative Commons Licences", people should > always specify the exact licence that they mean. > > > btw - Lawrence Lessig has some great lectures about this topic > > Lessig's "Free Culture" is well worth reading as well: > > http://www.free-culture.cc/ > > - Rob. > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
