Compatible is not equal so the British as a "good" and old empire will be independent from a USA- NGO financed by Soros and etc.
They say to you use this license but they dont care about tracking in fact they can track you, because they just want to control the content and not to sell your product (only if they think they profit - profit in a broader sense). What they care is about selling technologies and systems , and off course control the content , and also hype the ones that are using in order to expand their network. The benefit for the public ? Shure ? I am not shure, the systems of tracking and the internet police are getting worse, so whats the use of it ? Digital Culture is a term invented that can not be applied nowadays, what we are seeing is a process of digitalization of different cultures, in a world of various cultures. Sorry about my ignorance but what is FGPA and Tor style systems ? Software is a product or a service ? Because if we look at that as service , for the users they are equal. And as product even worse they had the same lay out and the same GUI. So, no innovation on both. They are both products on the market. IPV6 is a private concern ? Can you develop on that. How can you say that Culture Flat Rate does not work ? Have you read the reports on it ? Systems - interfaces - terms of use - moderators - quite the same everywhere. Free software but microprocessors dictatorship ? What i am saying is that 2 companies dominate that market of microprocessors (your computer run without them ?), whats the alternative to that and how can you talk about a free software in that situation. > Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:25:16 +0000 > From: r...@robmyers.org > To: netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org > Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] My Lawyer is an Artist: Free Culture Licenses as > Art Manifestos. > > On 14/11/11 22:47, Eduardo Valle wrote: > > Creative Commons is a NGO financed by Google (we are not evil :-))) and > > HP , invented and promoted by a Prof of Law from Havard, > > Larry Lessig. > > Oh it's far worse than that. They were originally funded by Soros's OSI > and have received donations from Microsoft. > > ;-) > > > The same University that costs 25.000 per semester for a student , in > > Europe or in any other country of the world this will pay at least one > > year of studies and in same cases all the masters course. > > Yes this is why I don't like educational institutions using > Non-Commercial licences. > > > Some goverments are adopting this license without even think about, the > > interests behind, who benefit from that ? > > The public. > > > Why the British goverment didnt accepted ? > > The UK Government wrote their vanity licence because the CC licences are > not currently recommended for data (this should be fixed in next year's > version 4 revisions), and the licence needed to be used for data such as > maps and statistics. > > They did explicitly write it to be compatible with the Creative Commons > Attribution licence, though. > > > Free Software, Free Culture - this terms should be rethinked it is like > > Digital Culture - > > > > Are you free ? What is freedom ? > > In this context, free as in free speech. > > >Are we living under the digitalization of cultures instead of "digital > >culture" ? > > Can you expand on that? It's sounds like a really important distinction. > > - Rob. > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
