>Be aware, Thomas, that a) most people (except the odd one or two) are very
>happy with the Active/NC situation, and always have been and that b) all
>other programmers were happy with NC2/NC3 (mainly NC2 sales), except you.
Considering the mails I get, I don't think so.
>For instance, you fail to say that you demand not only an initial deposit
>payment (�1000 afair?) but also a slight royalty *increase* for appp.device
>sales within NC3, last summer!
Yes of course I did! not �1000 but 4,20 DM per copy. why? because the
answer is 42. I did not care about the royalty increase, the advance
payment was the important part!
But your respond was only a threat anyway.
>Hold on? Why on earth should NC2 users, upgrading to NC3, get the *same*
>device, but have to pay again *and* even pay more? So, in effect, they would
>be paying twice for the same device? The device has barely changed since
>December 1998. In fact, the current appp.device is from December 1998.
Of course it is. You are pirating my work, remember. You don't get anything
better.
>Now, I was quite happy to match you royalty payments for NC3, but, with the
>state of the Amiga market, I wasn't prepared to pay for a deposit - mainly
>as I *knew* that NC3 sales wouldn't so good. In fact, this is been proved
>true as we've only sold 700~, which would have been less than the deposit
>paid to you to get appp.device into NC3!
happy to match????? You said:
"2) There is no way I am increasing (!) royalty payments!"
Anybody who wants the whole mail please mail me.
Thomas
--
[Team AMIGA] [PGP keys available]
_____________________________________________________________
NetConnect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send an 'unsubcribe'
message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
