Hi, Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I do not agree that ephemeral data should be outside the scope of the > standard.
I don't think anyone has said that. > I do not agree that YANG extensions should be used for IETF standards track > modules. I strongly disagree. This was one of the two original ideas behind extension statements (the other was that vendors could add their own stuff). > It was a mistake to define the "get-filter" hack in the first place. > IMO it is a mistake to define Lada's "annotation" statement as an extension. > > I don't think you are correct in your interpretation of "MAY ignore". > My reading of this text is that no YANG tool anywhere (or ever) > MUST or even SHOULD understand any YANG extension. > I don't see how YANG conformance applies to usage of extension > statements. It only applies to usage of YANG statements. Then I think we need to clarify the text in 6020bis. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
