On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:00:20AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > Hi, > > So why don't we make all the new YANG 1.1 statements like "action" > into extensions? This is just as good, right? It seems like real keywords > are for feature you like, and extensions are for features you don't like.
I guess we leave constructive communication here. > IMO ephemeral state is much more fundamental than the action-stmt. > Every YANG tool MUST understand any statements added for this purpose. Again, it remains unclear to me whether any changes to YANG are needed to support ephemeral state and as long as this is case (there is no agreement on the solution for ephemeral state) I am not that much interested to further delay YANG 1.1. There was agreement when we started work on YANG 1.1 that we want to finish this in a reasonable amount of time (~ 1 year) and I hope this agreement still holds true since this is what I am trying to achieve. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
